Political power attracts individuals with various motivations, shaping the allocation of economic resources and opportunities. When a leader ascends to a position of authority, particularly following a significant electoral win, the allure intensifies. People seek proximity to power to be considered insiders and bask in its prestige. While some bring competence and conviction, others offer experience and moral courage. Unfortunately, many are driven solely by the desire for personal gain through closeness to power. Among these individuals, the most perilous companions are those who constantly agree, refrain from questioning, and only echo the leader’s desires, often termed as “Yes Men.”
The resounding triumph of the BNP in the recent general elections, led by Tarique Rahman, has transformed Bangladesh’s political landscape. For many citizens, it signifies a shift and an opportunity to fortify democratic institutions. However, history reveals that overwhelming mandates can pose risks. Landslide victories may lead leaders to believe their authority is unassailable. In such scenarios, honest feedback might give way to flattery, and loyalty could be equated with blind obedience. While praise may be comforting, constructive criticism, based on evidence and delivered respectfully, is more valuable in preventing costly errors. Constructive criticism is pivotal for responsible citizenship, yet it is often misconstrued as disloyalty or unpatriotic.
In several societies, including Bangladesh, criticism is frequently misinterpreted. While constructive criticism aids in recognizing mistakes and driving improvement, it is sometimes met with suspicion. Disagreement with governmental decisions or criticism of leaders is swiftly labeled as anti-state or unpatriotic, stifling open dialogue and instilling fear. Silence in the face of dissent poses risks to any government.
Leaders who surround themselves with honest critics are better equipped to govern effectively than those insulated by constant praise. Yet, human ego, particularly when bolstered by power, shuns discomfort in favor of harmony. As Yes Men exert control, alternative voices are suppressed, critics are demonized, and inconvenient truths are concealed. The leader’s world gradually shrinks, isolated from differing perspectives. Over time, excessive praise can breed arrogance, transforming authority into entitlement.
Bangladesh has witnessed the consequences of succumbing to sycophancy during Sheikh Hasina’s 15-year rule. Her leadership became insular, with criticism viewed as disloyalty. Institutions meant to provide checks and balances were weakened, public grievances were disregarded, and a facade of stability replaced genuine engagement with reality. The collapse, when it occurred, seemed sudden to some but had been forewarned by visible signs for years.
Ironically, overwhelming electoral victories can hasten this decline. Leaders may start believing they represent the people’s will exclusively, transforming elections from accountability tools into self-validation mechanisms. Bangladesh’s past experiences show that such instances have led to concentrated power, sidelined dissent, and increased corruption.
The current mandate of the BNP presents an opportunity to rebuild institutions, restore trust, and reshape the political culture. It also necessitates exercising restraint to prevent authoritarian tendencies. Effective governance requires leaders who welcome disagreement, foster debate, and safeguard independent thinking. Advisers should be valued for their competence and integrity, not just loyalty. Above all, humility is essential, recognizing that electoral success does not equate to moral infallibility.
Leaders should shun Yes Men not only for their benefit but to preserve healthy institutions. Internal discourse within political parties, functioning institutions devoid of fear, and open discussions by the media and civil society contribute to robust governance. The lesson is clear: leaders falter not when criticism is loud but when silence prevails.
As Bangladesh embarks on a new political era, leadership will be tested by their willingness to heed dissenting voices. Nations suffer most when leaders prioritize comfort over truth. To break the cycle, those in power must resist the allure of constant praise. True leadership strength lies in the courage to confront reality. Hence, leaders should be cautious of Yes Men, as they often signal the onset of decline.
