Finance Adviser Dr. Salehuddin Ahmed stated that he foresees no legal issues upon leaving his position, emphasizing that he operated within legal boundaries and utilized limited discretionary authority. Addressing reporters following a Cabinet Committee on Government Purchase meeting, he asserted that he did not wield extraordinary powers and ensured that all matters adhered to proper protocols.
When asked about the prevalent political landscape in Bangladesh, where former officials often confront legal challenges post-regime changes, Dr. Salehuddin refrained from commenting on his colleagues, focusing solely on his actions. He highlighted the adherence to established procedures in granting approvals, like financial sanctions, exemplifying a complex decision regarding the elevation of primary school head teachers’ grades that was managed within the legal framework.
Regarding potential government missteps, the finance adviser clarified that the administration concentrated on enhancing institutions and processes rather than pursuing comprehensive structural transformations. He emphasized the enhancement of operational procedures within key entities such as the Bangladesh Bank and the National Board of Revenue (NBR) to streamline operations and introduce beneficial initiatives like the National Single Window.
Although acknowledging that institutional transformations were not entirely achieved, Dr. Salehuddin emphasized the substantial improvements in operational processes that have facilitated business operations and laid the groundwork for future advancements. Despite facing criticism for perceived lack of progress during the interim government’s tenure, he pointed out the unseen internal economic challenges managed by the administration and highlighted positive feedback from international partners on Bangladesh’s performance.
Recognizing both accomplishments and ongoing challenges, the adviser urged critics and the public to adopt a balanced perspective when evaluating the government’s achievements. He emphasized the importance of acknowledging partial progress and not dismissing the accomplishments made, encouraging constructive criticism while recognizing the advancements achieved during the government’s term.
