On February 1, 1962, a historic student strike and protest challenging Pakistan’s military rule erupted at the University of Dhaka. A key demand of the demonstrators was the fundamental right to freedom of speech and press. Personally participating in this significant event, I witnessed the fervor of the day.
Subsequently, after years of relentless struggle and sacrifices, Bangladesh gained independence. Over the past 55 years, the nation has navigated through various challenges and victories. Notably, in July-August 2024, a widespread uprising toppled an oppressive regime, marking a remarkable chapter in our history.
Following the removal of the authoritarian ruler, an interim government steered the country for almost 18 months. Despite high hopes pinned on this administration, many anticipated reforms in politics and the constitution remained stagnant. Furthermore, crucial recommendations from reform commissions were left unattended.
Throughout the interim government’s tenure, media outlets, including newspapers and television channels, encountered obstacles in operating freely. Pressured by various forces, media management changes, editor replacements, and journalist dismissals became common occurrences. The media landscape became turbulent, leading to uncertainty and self-censorship among media organizations.
Reflecting on Prothom Alo’s experiences during this period, we grappled with an atmosphere of fear. Extremist groups exerted pressure and issued threats against us, along with The Daily Star, both domestically and internationally. In a distressing turn of events, extremists staged a week-long demonstration in front of the Prothom Alo office in December 2025, culminating in a destructive blaze that ravaged our premises.
The government’s lack of decisive action to prevent the destruction at Prothom Alo’s office raised concerns. Despite the establishment of a Media Reform Commission by the interim government, tangible progress in implementing crucial media reforms remained elusive. This inertia left the media fraternity grappling with uncertainties and limitations.
Subsequently, a general election was held on February 12, 2026, signaling a shift in power dynamics as BNP secured a significant victory after nearly two decades. The pivotal question now revolves around the nation’s direction post this political transformation, especially concerning media freedom, journalist safety, and fostering an environment conducive to unbiased journalism.
Having served as the editor of Bhorer Kagoj and Prothom Alo during BNP’s previous terms in government, I recall a period of relative journalistic freedom. Despite critical scrutiny of the government’s policies during the 2001-2006 tenure, we maintained access to top leadership without facing undue harassment or legal repercussions.
Conversely, under the prior authoritarian regime, journalists and editors faced arrests and legal battles, instilling fear and intimidation. Prothom Alo endured sustained pressures, including circulation restrictions and advertising disruptions, culminating in numerous legal cases, including one under the Digital Security Act.
The return of BNP to power has sparked optimism among the populace, given the party’s commitments outlined in its reform program and election manifesto. Emphasizing media freedom and protection of journalists, these pledges indicate a potentially constructive approach towards nurturing a vibrant and independent press.
Despite these assurances, concrete steps to revamp the media sector are awaited. Efforts to introduce newspaper auditing systems and clear pending bills remain pending, signaling a need for urgent reforms. Reports of interference in media management and concerns over potential threats to freedom of expression underscore the pressing need for proactive measures.
As we tread this critical juncture, echoing the demands from 64 years ago for freedom of speech and press, the enduring struggle for these fundamental rights persists. Amid evolving political landscapes and changing administrations, the essence of these core demands remains unchanged, underscoring the perpetual significance of safeguarding these liberties.
Concluding my 56-year journalistic journey, I am reminded of the enduring question that has echoed since 1962: how much longer must we wait?
